Legal Opinion

Application of Luke Thorington, Gerald Schiazzano and Joel Shurgan

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 26, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8188PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration, affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 6, 7, 9, 15, 24, 26, 27 and 28 1 in appellants’ application2 on the ground of double patenting. One claim has been indicated to be allowable.

The invention relates to a noncircular cross-section fluorescent lamp tube and resides particularly in providing the usual generally cylindrical envelope of a fluorescent lamp with one or more grooves or deformations which are rotated around and along the envelope’s longitudinal axis in a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re HargravesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. In re DuboisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. In Re BarberCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  4. Application of Paul H. AldrichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  5. Application of PhelanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. Perricone, M.D. v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. In Re Paolo LongiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. In Re Anita Dembiczak and Benson ZinbargCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Carman Industries, Inc. v. Eugene A. Wahl and Vibra Screw, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Shelcore, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durham Industries, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API