Legal Opinion

ROPAT CORPORATION v. McGraw-Edison Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 5, 1975No. Civ. A. Nos. 74 C 3459, 74 C 205Published

1Opinion of the Court

393 F.Supp. 1108 (1975)

ROPAT CORPORATION, Plaintiff,

v.

McGRAW-EDISON CO., and Marshall Field & Co., Defendants.

Civ. A. Nos. 74 C 3459, 74 C 205.

United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

May 5, 1975.

Richard R. Trexler, Olson, Trexler, Wolters, Bushnell & Fosse, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

James Van Santen, Hill, Gross, Simpson, Van Santen, Steadman, Chiara & Simpson, Chicago, Ill., for McGraw Edison.

Clarence J. Fleming, McDougall, Hersh & Scott, Chicago, Ill., for Marshall Field.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

McLAREN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Application of Luke Thorington, Gerald Schiazzano and Joel ShurganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. In re DuboisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. In re SwettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  4. Mr. Hanger, Inc. v. Cut Rate Plastic Hangers, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1974
  5. Ropat Corp. v. West Bend Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API