Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Ward

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Traill County; Pollock, J. Action by Daniel Patterson against G. A. Ward and others for the appointment of a receiver and to foreclose a mortgage. After jitdgment, plaintiff moved for an order against H. D. Hurley, receiver, to pay over certain money. J. E. Paulson and others inter-pleaded, and from an order granting the motion-they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

This is an appeal from what is denominated in the record an “order offsetting judgments.” No question of practice is raised. In 1894 one H. D. Hurley was appointed as receiver, by the District Court of Traill County, in an action entitled “Daniel Patterson vs. G. A. Ward, et ai.” Under the terms of his appointment it was his duty to crop the lands involved in that litigation for that year, and in carrying out such purposes he employed G. A. Ward, he being one of the defendants in that action, to harvest, shock, and care for the grain. In November of that year after the business of the farming…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Patterson v. WardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Patterson v. WardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Crittenberger v. Farmers & Merchants National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Storing v. Mandan Special School DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API