Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Ward

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Traill County; McConnell, J. Action by Daniel Patterson against G. A. Ward and others. From a judgment allowing part of the account of a receiver appointed in the action, plaintiff appeals. On motion to dismiss.

1Opinion of the CourtWallin, J.

In April, 1894, H. D. Hurley, by an order of the trial court made herein; was appointed as receiver of certain lands involved in this litigation, including a certain farm, and by the same order the receiver was directed to carry on and crop said farm for said year of 1894. Pursuant to an order so to do, the receiver presented his account as such receiver in November of that year. The account embraced all transactions by the receiver, as such, from the date of his appointment to the date of presenting said account. The receiver did not ask for his discharge, and in fact has never been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hovey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Hinckley v. Gilman, Clinton, & Springfield RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. State ex rel. Heinze v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. H. C. Smith Coal Co. v. FinleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Olson v. MattisonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Patterson v. WardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API