Legal Opinion
United States v. Begay
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 20, 2010No. 09-10249, 09-10258PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BYBEE, Circuit Judge:
Defendants-Appellants Brandon Dineshu Begay and Ozzy Carl Watchman (collectively, “Defendants” 1 ) are convicted sex offenders. They initially registered as sex offenders with the State of Arizona pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), but did not update their registration information when they moved to a different Arizona address within the territory of the Navajo Nation, a federally recognized Indian tribe. Defendants were indicted for failing to update their registration, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a) and 42 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. La FrancaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- The American Civil Liberties U v. Catherine MastoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Carel, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Joshua ElkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. ShoulderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.