Legal Opinion
United States v. Joshua Elkins
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 14, 2012No. 11-30135PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
Congress, by enacting the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SOR-NA”), 42 U.S.C. § 16901 et seq., in July 2006, sought to establish “a comprehensive national system for the registration” of sex offenders and offenders against children. 42 U.S.C. § 16901. In October 2010, a single count indictment issued against Joshua A. Elkins in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, charging him with traveling in interstate commerce and knowingly failing to register under SORNA in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). On Elkins’s…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PerezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- State v. Petersen-BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- M.S. Willman v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. ShoulderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Under SealCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.