Legal Opinion
Miano v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 23, 1995No. 91 Civ. 1280 (BN), 91 Civ. 1676 (BN) and 91 Civ. 3906(BN)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BERNARD NEWMAN, Senior Judge: 1
In this consolidated action, three former advertising executives allege that they were unlawfully terminated by reason of their age. The case was assigned to the writer, sitting without a jury, for the purpose of determining whether, under Ford Motor Company v. EEOC, 458 U.S. 219, 102 S.Ct. 3057, 73 L.Ed.2d 721 (1982), plaintiffs should be precluded from recovering back pay accruing after the date when they rejected offers of reinstatement made to them by defendant during the pendency of this litigation, as well as…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Joseph Dominic, Cross-Appellant v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Whittlesey v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shea v. IcelandairDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Bayard v. RiccitelliDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Webber v. International Paper Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Eastmer v. Williamsville Central School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Vera v. Alstom Power, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.