Legal Opinion

Gard v. Razanskas

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1957No. 49248PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWennerstrum, J.

-Plaintiff sought recovery of $1000 claiming there had been an unjust enrichment of the defendants. This contention is based on the theory the plaintiff had an option to purchase land of the defendants; that they, the defendants, refused to credit on the option contract the proceeds of an insurance payment received by reason of a fire and destruction of a barn and shed on the land, which loss occurred prior to the exercise of the option of purchase. The defendants denied the plaintiff had any right to the insurance proceeds under the option provision in the lease. They maintained the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wm. Skinner & Sons' Ship-Building & Dry-Dock Co. v. HoughtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  2. Estate of Lamb v. MorrowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Williams v. LilleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  4. Brady v. WelshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. Cullen & Vaughn Co. v. Bender Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Holden v. Construction MacHinery CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Smith v. StowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  3. Irons v. Community State BankCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
  4. Kintzel v. Wheatland Mutual Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. A & a Metal Buildings v. I-S, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API