Gilles v. Sprout
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
This is an equitable action for specific performance of an executory contract for the sale and purchase of real estate. The appeal is from a post-trial order denying relief to plaintiff-vendee. The trial court determined on stipulated facts that plaintiffvendee, in possession of real estate under an executory sales contract which was silent with respect to the obligation of insurance, was not entitled to have credited in satisfaction of the balance of his purchase price the proceeds of insurance paid to the vendor upon a total loss by fire of a dwelling located upon the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brownell v. Board of Education of Inside Tax District of City of Saratoga SpringsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Ames v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Culbertson v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Closuit v. MitbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Cetkowski v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hillard v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Moran v. Kenai Towing and Salvage, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Bryant v. Willison Real Estate Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Maplewood v. KavanaghSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Balsam v. BuehnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.