Legal Opinion

Savings Bank of Rockville v. Cohn

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 11, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The complaint alleged that the assumption agreement sued upon was executed by the defendants as trustees for the purpose of obtaining forbearance of the plaintiff to call for payment of its note in full and foreclo'se the mortgage securing it, and, in a second count, that the defendants executed the agreement without any express authority under the will or from the Court of Probate, exceeded their powers, and thereby contracted personally.

The plaintiff is the holder of a note for $18,000 secured by first mortgage on premises in Hartford, executed by Isaac and Sarah Tamaren, payable on demand…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cook v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
  2. Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Skelly v. Bristol Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  4. Mascolo v. MontesantoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  5. State Ex Rel. Marsh v. LumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Superior Wire & Paper Products, Ltd. v. Talcott Tool & Machine, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Iseli Co. v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Hofmann v. DefeliceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  4. Sandelli v. DuffySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API