Legal Opinion

Arista v. Mule Creek State Prison CA3

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 2013No. C068541Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 9/27/13 Arista v. Mule Creek State Prison CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Amador) ALFRED ARISTA, C068541 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 09CV6221) v. MULE CREEK STATE PRISON et al., Defendants and Respondents.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. William Raymond Klingele v. Kenneth O. Eikenberry Amos Reed Larry Kincheloe Tana Wood Mr. Gleason James Thatcher Mr. McCleanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API