Legal Opinion
Epic Enterprises, Inc. v. Brothers
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided January 6, 1975No. 74-C-296PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss, the Court finds and concludes that the same should be granted.
The claims asserted by the Plaintiff are alleged to arise under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78n(a), 1 a fortiori Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 14 (a)-9, 17 CFR § 240.14a-9, promulgated thereunder. 2 3 Prior to September 29, 1973 Defendants were the duly elected and acting Directors of the Plaintiff corporation. On September 29, 1973 Plaintiff held its Annual Stockholders’ Meeting for the purpose of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Barnett v. Anaconda CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Smith v. MurchisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Downing v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,000 Ora E. Gaines v. D. J. Haughton, Lois A. And James Fitzpatrick v. D. J. HaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- In Re Commonwealth Oil/Tesoro Petroleum Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1979
- Markewich v. AdikesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976
- National Home Products, Inc. v. GrayDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1976
- Halle & Stieglitz, Filor, Bullard Inc. v. Empress International, Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.