Legal Opinion
Halle & Stieglitz, Filor, Bullard Inc. v. Empress International, Ltd.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 2, 1977No. Civ. A. 75-33PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LATCHUM, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, Halle & Stieglitz, Filor, Bullard Inc. (“Halle & Stieglitz”) and M. A. Gordon & Co., Inc. (“Gordon”), 1 by an amended complaint seek to enforce liabilities and duties against the defendants allegedly created by Sections 10(b), 14(a) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 78j, 78n(a), 78n(e)], Rule 10(b)(5), [17 C.F.R. 334, § 240.-10b-5], and by Delaware law. 2 The defendants are: (1) Empress International, Ltd. (“Empress”), a Delaware corporation which has its principal office in Lake Success, New York, and is engaged in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Warner Communications, Inc. v. MurdochDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- Valente v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- Paul S. Mullin & Associates, Inc. v. BassettDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1986
- Bertoglio v. Texas International Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Norman v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.