Legal Opinion
Barnett v. Anaconda Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 17, 1965PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge:
Plaintiff alleges that he is a minority-stockholder (100 shares) of Anaconda Wire and Cable Company (Wire and Cable), a Delaware corporation now dissolved. Prior to dissolution, more than 73% of the stock of Wire and Cable was owned by defendant Anaconda Company (Anaconda). The shares of both companies were listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Plaintiff brings this action against Anaconda in a representative capacity on behalf of himself and all minority stockholders similarly situated and derivatively on behalf of Wire and Cable, naming Wire and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Leo Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, Inc., and Charles H. Dowd, Stuart A. Wixson, George J. Springer, C. H. Donohue and Crown Finance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,714 Edwin J. Herpich v. Robert H. Wallace, Jack E. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.