Legal Opinion

Jose Fuentes Co., Inc., D/B/A Gloria's v. Mario Sabino's, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided November 26, 2013No. 05-11-00228-CVPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice EVANS.

The Court decides this appeal en banc to resolve the important issues raised regarding no-evidence summary judgment practice. Appellants complain that a no-evidence motion for summary judgment that challenges “one or more” of the listed elements of each of appellants’ claims— without identifying the specific element or elements being challenged — is legally insufficient. We conclude such a motion fails to meet the standard of specificity mandated by rule 166a(i) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure because it fails to identify what element or elements are being…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Timpte Industries, Inc. v. GishTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Chessher v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. City of Midland v. O'BRYANTTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Justin Curtis Nall, Robert W. Nall, and Olga L. Nall v. John B. PlunkettTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. Fuqua, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation v. Henry Andrew Hansen, II, M.D.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Robert D. Coleman v. Reed W. Prospere, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  3. De La Cruz v. KailerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. B.C. v. Steak N Shake Operations, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. David Gillespie and Michael O'Brien v. A.L. Hernden and Frederick R. Zlotucha, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2016

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API