Legal Opinion

Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. Fuqua

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided October 12, 2000No. 14-99-00187-CVPublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WANDA McKEE FOWLER, Justice.

This is an appeal from the grant of a no-evidence summary judgment. Specialty Retailers, Inc. (SRI) sued Aviex Jet, Inc., Richard L. Fuqua, and David D. Trigg for causes of action arising from the operation of a corporate jet. Fuqua moved for a no-evidence summary judgment, and it was granted as to all claims. Fuqua’s case was then severed, and the summary judgment order became final. Finding the summary judgment proper as to all but two causes of action, we affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Facts

In this case, as the facts below reveal, SRI…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. CryeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Moore v. K Mart Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. Lampasas v. Spring Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  5. Mapco, Inc. v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. Carter v. MacFadyen, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  2. Callaghan Ranch, Ltd. v. Killam, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  3. Restaurant Teams International, Inc. v. MG Securities Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  4. Fraud-Tech, Inc. v. Choicepoint, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Martinez v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API