Legal Opinion

Morrissey v. Board of Education

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 8, 1985No. File 66830PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGaffney, J.

The court has for its consideration the defendant Craig Peters’ motion for summary judgment. The motion is predicated on a claimed bar to any recovery by the plaintiff because of the applicable statute of limitations.

By way of background, the plaintiff was a Naugatuck High School student who, it is alleged, was injured during a physical education class at the school. The incident occurred on January 18, 1980, and, as a result, the plaintiff’s prior counsel brought suit in this court naming the borough of Naugatuck as the sole defendant in an action founded on the negligence of Peters, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baker v. BaningosoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  2. Gallo v. G. Fox & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. Dirton v. McCarthyConnecticut Superior Court · 1960

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Finkle v. CarrollConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. Burnham v. Pierre, No. Cv 92-0519308 (Feb. 22, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
  3. Butcher v. Saint Francis Hospital, No. Cv92-0514585 S (Nov. 15, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
  4. Chomicz v. Amer. Legion Meriden Post 45, No. Cv95-0375597s (Mar. 26, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
  5. Costello v. City of Norwalk, No. Cv90 0268834s (Nov. 16, 1990)Connecticut Superior Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API