Legal Opinion

Dirton v. McCarthy

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided September 28, 1960No. File No. 70100PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff complains that her case was discontinued contrary to the provisions of § 193 of the Practice Book in that no notice was given to her. The counsel of record had resigned from the bar on February 6, 1959, and the case was discontinued on May 6, 1960. There is no evidence or claim that the clerk of this court did not follow the rules as prescribed by the Practice Book. It is the contention of the plaintiff that inasmuch as the counsel of record had resigned prior to giving of notice, he could not be counsel of record. There is no requirement under the rules that the notice be sent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hayden v. R. Wallace & Sons Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. Jarvis v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  3. Johnston v. SikesConnecticut Superior Court · 1888
  4. Johnson v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. Board of EducationConnecticut Superior Court · 1985
  2. Butcher v. Saint Francis Hospital, No. Cv92-0514585 S (Nov. 15, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
  3. Costello v. City of Norwalk, No. Cv90 0268834s (Nov. 16, 1990)Connecticut Superior Court · 1990
  4. Donahue v. DearbornConnecticut Appellate Court · 1969
  5. New Milford Block Co. v. EricsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API