Legal Opinion
Trenton Potteries Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 9, 1924No. 219PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It is not necessary to review the facts at large; sufficient to note that the subject-matter of prosecution is a trade agreement to maintain a central bureau of information, disseminate knowledge of prices, customers, discounts, etc., obtained thereby, and thus persuade or induce the large number of sanitary pottery manufacturers who belonged to the association to conduct their businesses in a reasonably uniform manner as to prices and discounts and protect the jobbers who constituted their largest normal “outlet.” While differing in detail, the schemes…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Trenton Potteries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Brosious v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Brownlow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Brosious v. Pepsi-Cola Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
- Tilbury v. Oregon Stevedoring Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.