Legal Opinion

Tilbury v. Oregon Stevedoring Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 1925No. 4542PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

From a decree entered upon motion to dismiss a complaint in a suit brought to restrain the appellees from violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act (Comp. St. §§ 8820-8823, 8827-8830), and acts amendatory thereof, and for damages in accordance with the provisions of the Clayton. Act (38 Stat. 730), plaintiffs appeal.

The complaint charges that an illeg’al combination existed among shipowners and operators at the port of Portland, controlling nearly all of the Portland longshore and stevedoring business to and from ships engaged in interstate and foreign transportation ; that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. United Leather Workers International Union, Local Lodge or Union No. 66 v. Herkert & Meisel Trunk Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Industrial Assn. of San Francisco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Finley v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Shipowners' Ass'n of Pacific CoastCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  2. Red Top Gas, Inc. v. Dale Hensley & Fred HawkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Anderson v. BakerMontana Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API