Legal Opinion
Brosious v. Pepsi-Cola Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 15, 1945No. 856PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, William G. Brosious, by this suit seeks recovery of treble damages from the defendants, Pepsi-Cola Company and Cloverdale Spring Company, under the Anti-Trust Act of July 2, 1890, IS U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2, IS, on the ground .that the defendants, pursuant ito an alleged unlawful conspiracy, refused to sell the manufactured products of the Cloverdale bottling plant, which included Pepsi-Cola, to the plaintiff unless he refrain from buying, selling, or handling soft drinks made by independent manufacturers who were competing with the defendants for the trade of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Joint Traffic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hopkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McElhenney Co., Inc., W. F. Snipes, George Toole, Mac Toole, R. P. Swofford, Charles L. Gasque and Harry Clinkscales v. Western Auto Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- Osborn v. Sinclair Refining CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
- McElhenney Co. v. Western Auto Supply CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1958
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. BladeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953