Legal Opinion

In re Avard

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonald P. Gorman, J.

The present proceeding under section 21 of the Stock Corporation Law was instituted by minority stockholders possessing' 477 shares of the 5,932 outstanding shares of preferred stock, par value $100, and 5,674 shares of the 40,000 outstanding shares of common stock, par value $25, of the Oneita Knitting Mills for an order determining the value of their stock or for the appointment of an appraiser to determine its value.

The respondent Oneita Knitting Mills, a domestic stock corporation organized in 1893, conducted its manufacturing operations entirely within the city of Utica, New York, until…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. . BallardNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Matter of TimmisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Skinner v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Matter of Miglietta (2660 Broadway Corp.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Schreiber v. Butte Copper & Zinc Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Angeion Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. November v. National Exhibition Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Dukas v. Davis Aircraft Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Stream TV Networks, Inc. v. SeeCubic, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API