Legal Opinion
Schreiber v. Butte Copper & Zinc Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 6, 1951PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
There are three separate motions before the Court in two actions brought by the plaintiff, a stockholder of Butte Copper & Zinc Co., hereinafter referred to as Butte, against Butte and against Anaconda Copper Mining Co., hereinafter referred to as Anaconda.
One action is admittedly a derivative suit on behalf of Butte, wherein judgment is sought requiring the co-defendant Anaconda to account to Butte for profits derived by Anaconda by reason of its continued operation of Butte’s mines and properties after June 24, 1950.
The other action, asserted by plaintiff to be a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Matter of TimmisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. American Bond & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- G & N AIRCRAFT, INC. v. BoehmIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Dinuro Investments, LLC v. CamachoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Johnson v. American General Insurance Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1969
- Howard v. FurstDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.