Legal Opinion
Riordan v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 28, 2010No. 10-1034PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH.
KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge:
The New Mexico State Treasurer’s Office invested some of the state’s revenues in securities. From 1996 to 2002, the Treasurer’s Office selected Guy Riordan’s brokerage firms for many of those transactions. But the process for choosing brokerage firms was corrupt: Riordan paid kickbacks to New Mexico’s Treasurer for the business. The crooked scheme ultimately unraveled amid a series of government investigations and enforcement actions. Relevant here is an action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission, in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First City Financial Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Patricia A. Johnson v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kokesh v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Kokesh v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- SEC v. Guy GentileCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. CollyardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. KokeshCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.