Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1902No. Crim. No. 942PublishedCited by 8 opinions

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from an order refusing to settle a bill of exceptions to be used upon appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. N. H. Conklin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

This is an appeal by the defendant in a criminal action from an order made after final judgment refusing to settle her bill of exceptions as proposed. It seems that more than ten days after the conclusion of her trial she presented a bill which included not only her exceptions taken at the trial, but also her exception to an order of the court denying her motion to set aside the information with the proceedings thereon which took place before entry of her plea. Objection was made to the allowance of that part of the bill relating to the motion, upon the ground that it was the proper subject…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whipple v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. In Re MayenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Pueblo v. BarquetSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1912
  4. Pueblo v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1924
  5. Pueblo v. RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API