Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

California Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1903No. Crim. No. 933PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment convicting her of the crime of embezzlement and from an order denying her motion for a new trial.

There is also an attempted appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment; but as there is no authority of law for the same, it may be disregarded. (People v. Sansome, 98 Cal. 235.)

1. The first point made by appellant is, that the information should have been set aside on her motion made in the trial court, because defendant had not been legally examined and committed by a magistrate.

There is no bill of exceptions or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SansomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. People v. SalorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. HarmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. McCallaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Glaros v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  4. Hildebrand v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. People v. RubensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API