Legal Opinion
Fuller v. Artman
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1893PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Edward 1C. Fuller and others against Arthur M. Art-man for specific performance. From a judgment entered in Genesee county in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDwight, P. J.
The plaintiffs are the assignees of the persons named as parties of the second part in the contract hereinafter set forth, and they bring this action to enforce its specific performance by the defendant, the party of the first part, named therein. The contract was in the following terms:
“This memorandum of agreement, made and executed this 23d day of September, 1890, between Arthur M. Artman, of the town of Le Roy, county of Genesee, and state of New York, of the first part, and David J. Bissell and Emory Elmore, of the town of Le Roy, county of Genesee, and state of New York, associates or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Halpin v. . Phenix Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Grout v. TownsendNew York Supreme Court · 1845
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cochran v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Watkins v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
- Mathews Slate Co. v. New Empire Slate Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1903
- Spitzli v. GuthNew York Supreme Court · 1920
- Helmick v. ProbstNew York Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.