Legal Opinion

Helmick v. Probst

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

This is a motion by defendant for summary judgment, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint upon the ground that the *285second affirmative defense, together with a concession as to a written agreement hereinafter referred to, constitute a complete bar to plaintiffs’ action.

The action is simply for an indebtedness of $8,000 claimed to be owing from defendant to plaintiffs’ testatrix. Five affirmative defenses are pleaded in the answer. The only one with which we are concerned upon this motion is the second, it being conceded that the remaining defenses raise triable issues. The second affirmative…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ga Nun v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Lawrence v. McCalmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  3. Robb v. . Washington Jefferson CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Carnwright v. . GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Hegeman v. . MoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dillard v. DillardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. In re the Estate of CairnsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
  3. Preston v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  4. Preston v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  5. Preston v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API