Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Nyquist

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided August 27, 1982No. Civ-1972-325CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIN, Chief Judge.

In what threatens to become an annual ritual, the Buffalo Board of Education [the Board] is forced to ask this court to order its codefendants, the Mayor and the Common Council of the City of Buffalo [City defendants], to provide additional funds to the Board for implementation of this court’s school desegregation orders.

For the 1982-83 school year, the Board requested a budget of $162,302,979. Pursuant to the budgetary process of the City charter and section 2576 of the New York State Education Law, the Mayor received this request from the Board. The Mayor and his staff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Citizens Concerned for Separation of Church and State v. The City and County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  2. George Arthur v. Ewald P. NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. Hurd v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Hurd v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. Arthur v. NyquistDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arthur v. NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Arthur v. ManchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. Arthur v. NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Arthur v. ManchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Arthur v. NyquistDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API