Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Nyquist
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 23, 1983No. Civ-1972-325PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURTIN, Chief Judge.
Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion to require defendant Board of Education [the Board] to devise a new plan to increase the number of majority students at three remaining racially identifiable elementary schools in the Buffalo Public School System. The Board has responded that it has now achieved the maximum level of systemwide desegregation practicably possible and is unable to devise any new plans which would feasibly increase the number of majority students attending these schools at this time. Upon close scrutiny and a review of the record, and in consideration of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Green v. County School Board of New Kent CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stell v. Bd. of Public Educ. of City of SavannahDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1988
- United States v. Charleston County School DistrictDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1990
- Diaz v. San Jose Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1986
- Arthur v. NyquistDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1985