Legal Opinion
Russell v. Washington Life Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action against a life insurance company.
1Opinion of the CourtErlanger, J.
The plaintiff, claiming to be a policyholder of the Washington Life Insurance Company, brings this, action on behalf of himself and other policyholders of that company similarly situated, and the application before me is for an injunction and receiver pendente lite founded upon these facts: The Washington Company was incorporated in 1860 under the act of 1853, entitled “An act to provide for the incorporation of life and health insurance companies."’’ It carried on the business for which it was organized in this State down to the execution of the contract of December, 1908, to which reference…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. New York & Northern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- People Ex Rel. Continental Ins. Co. v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Coler v. Pittsburgh Bridge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Sigua Iron Co. v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Barrett v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Oustecky v. Farmingdale Lanes, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1964
- Russell v. Pittsburgh Life & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Bauer v. Union Central Life InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Russell v. Pittsburgh Life & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1909