Legal Opinion

Varian v. Stevens

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided June 15, 1853PublishedCited by 11 opinions

This was an appeal by W. H. Paine, from an order made at special term, directing liim to complete a purchase made by him., of certain lots, sold under the judgment in this action, which was an action for the partition and sale of real estate, situate in the city of New York. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBy the Court. Bosworth, J.

This was an action for the partition of real estate, situate in the city of New York.

The real estate was sold in parcels, pursuant to a judgment in the action. W. H. Paine bought certain lots at the sale, and now appeals from an order made at special term, directing him to complete his purchase.

The purchaser objects, that the proceedings and sale are ineffectual to vest in him the title to the lots purchased, on the grounds:—

1. That the summons was not served on the minors, George W. Varían and Letitia Varian, personally, and that, therefore, the appointment of a guardian ad litem,, for them,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grant v. SchoonhovenNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
  2. Nelson v. MoonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1843
  3. Minor v. BettsNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  4. People v. M. HoffmanNew York Supreme Court · 1832

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jennings v. JenningsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1855
  2. Sloane v. MartinNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  3. O'Donoghue v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Rogers v. McLeanNew York Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Rogers v. McLeanNew York Supreme Court · 1860

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API