Nelson v. Moon
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
At law.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT. The facts in this case being admitted, it is submitted to the court without the intervention of a jury. The defendants pleaded the general issue, and under the rule of court have specified by metes and bounds the various tracts of land which they claim, and of which they have possession. A patent issued to Breckenridge for the land in controversy, and other tracts, the fifteenth of February, eighteen hundred and three, in all amounting to seventeen hundred and sixty-six and two-thirds acres. Robert Campbell was the owner of the warrants on which the locations were made…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Horner v. DoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
- Pursley v. HayesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Boker v. ChaplineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
- Varian v. StevensThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
- Bates v. HerronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.