Legal Opinion

Duncan v. LaRose

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 24, 2020No. 2:20-cv-02295Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Richard Duncan, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:20–cv–2295 Judge Michael H. Watson v. Magistrate Judge Deavers Frank LaRose, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Richard Duncan (“Plaintiff”) sues Secretary of State Frank LaRose (“Secretary LaRose”), Governor Mike DeWine (the “Governor”), and the Ohio General Assembly (collectively “Defendants”), seeking a declaration that Ohio Revised Code Sections 3513.262 and 3513.263 unconstitutionally and unlawfully restrict his rights. Compl., ECF No. 1. One week after Plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Duncan v. HustedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API