Legal Opinion
Duncan v. Husted
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 26, 2015No. Case No. 2:13-CV-01157PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
ALGENON L. MARBLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Secretary Husted’s Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 64), as well as pro se Plaintiff Richard Duncan’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 80); both motions are brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. This case concerns the constitutionality of.SJB. 47, effective June 21, 2013, which, in pertinent part, amended Ohio Revised Code §§ 3513.262 and .263 to impose a one-year time-limit for independent candidates to obtain requisite nominating petition signatures in order to appear on…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Duncan v. LaRoseDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- George Richardson v. Texas Secretary of StateDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020