Legal Opinion

Modeste v. Local 1199, Drug, Hospital & Health Care Employees Union

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 2, 1994No. 90 CIV 4159(SS)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SOTOMAYOR, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to § 6 of the Norris-LaGuardia Act, ch. 90, 47 Stat. 70 (1932), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 106 (1992), for injuries inflicted upon them by union members during a lawful strike by Local 1199, Drug, Hospital and Health Care Employees Union, RWDSU, AFL-CIO, (“Local 1199” or the “Union”). Defendants move to dismiss the second, fifth and seventh causes of action of the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Defendants also move to remand the remaining…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nweke v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. Palladino v. CNY Centro, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. A. Terzi Productions, Inc. v. Theatrical Protective UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  4. Podell v. Citicorp Diners Club, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  5. Lillbask Ex Rel. Mauclaire v. SergiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API