Netscape Communications Corp. v. ValueClick, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge.
At issue on summary judgment in this patent infringement suit is whether certain materials qualify as prior art references that may anticipate, and thus invalidate, U.S. Patent No. 5,774,670 (“the '670 pat ent”), colloquially known as the “Internet cookies” patent, under 35 U.S.C. § 102. 1
I
The following undisputed material facts are pertinent to defendants’ 2 prior art invalidity defense: 3
1. In the summer and fall of 1994, plaintiff developed and sold to MCI Communications Corp. (“MCI”) software that was to be integrated into MCI’s online…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- SAM'S RIVERSIDE, INC. v. Intercon Solutions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2011
- Kenexa Brassring, Inc. v. Taleo Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- AstraZeneca LP v. Breath Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC v. R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023