People v. James
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1038On this record, the showup was not unduly suggestive (see, People v Blake, 35 NY2d 331, 337). The possibility that the police may have referred to the defendant as a “suspect” (see, People v Logan, 25 NY2d 184, 192, cert denied 396 US 1020) or that the defendant may have been handcuffed (see, People v Thomas, 105 AD2d 1098; People v Johnson, 102 AD2d 616, 617, lv denied 63 NY2d 776) does not, without more, render the showup unnecessarily suggestive; nor does the fact that the eyewitness could observe the defendant from a vantage point where he could not see her (see, People v Brown, 20 NY2d…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. SatloffNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. LoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. BarringerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. LomackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.