Legal Opinion
Bonastia v. Berman Bros., Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided December 21, 1995No. 94-2671-TUBREPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TURNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Paul F. Bonastia (“Bonastia”) brought this action claiming defendant Ber-man Bros., Inc. (“Berman Bros.”) breached his alleged two-year employment contract when it terminated him on June 27, 1994. Presently before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
I. FACTS
The facts relevant to this motion are largely undisputed. Berman Bros, is an Illinois corporation that maintains an office in Memphis, Tennessee. According to an October 5, 1992…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- International Flight Center v. City of MurfreesboroCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Simonton v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Baptist Physician Hospital Organization, Inc. And Baptist Hospital of East Tennessee, Inc. v. Humana Military Healthcare Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Prudential Securities, Inc. v. MillsDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1996
- Baptist Physician v. Humana MilitaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.