Legal Opinion

State v. Hendrix

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 14, 1910No. 7576PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Before Gage, J., Barnwell, Fall Term, 1909. Indictment against Frank Hendrix for burglary and larceny. Defendant appeals from sentence.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The defendant was convicted under an indictment, containing two separate counts — one for burglary and the other for larceny, growing out of the same transaction. The verdict of the jury was simply “guilty.”

The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a term of five years, on the public works of Barnwell County, and he appealed from said sentence.

1 The first exception is too general for consideration! as it merely quotes from the charge of his Honor thé presiding Judge, without assigning any specific error.

2 The second exception is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  2. Deberry v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Jennings v. Edgefield Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  4. Snipes v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  2. State v. RouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. State v. DuckSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. CriddleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. Bennett v. Columbia Electric Street Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API