Legal Opinion

Bailey, Collector of Internal Revenue v. George

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 15, 1922No. 590PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

The decree entered herein by the District Court and appealed from, directly, to this court, under § 238 of the Judicial Code, recited that the complainants operated a manufacturing plant for the production of cotton goods in Gaston County, North Carolina; that the defendant was a Federal Collector of Internal Revenue; that on the ground that complainants had employed children in their factory within the limits of ages prescribed in § 1200 of the act of Congress, known as the Child Labor Tax Law, approved February 24, 1919, c. 18, 40 Stat. 1057, 1138, they were under its terms assessed the sum…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dodge v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1916

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. National Federation of Independent Business v. SebeliusSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Bob Jones University v. SimonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Alexander v. "Americans United" Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Cool Fuel, Incorporated v. William H. Connett, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API