Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Staples

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1935No. Docket No. 82, Calendar No. 38,142PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson Sharpe, J.

The plaintiff, as receiver of Evelyn Carlyle, Inc., a corporation, brought this action to recover from the defendant on a promissory note, reading as follows:

“Grand Bapids, Mich., November 4, 1931.
“On demand I promise to pay to the order of Evelyn Carlyle, Inc., One Thousand-Dollars, with interest at 6 per cent, after demand. Value received. Payable at Grand Bapids Savings Bank.
“Loren J. Staples.”

In his answer defendant denied the right of plaintiff to recover on the note for a number of reasons stated therein. On October 2, 1933, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. The undisputed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baxter v. SzucsMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Dempsey v. LangtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Cass v. Washington Finance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Agnew v. LibbyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Robertson v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Maser v. GibbonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. American Employers' Ins. v. H. G. Christman & Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Eston v. Robert Brown, Ltd.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API