Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 4, 2023No. 3:22-cv-08116Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Amy M arie Foreman, ) No. CV-22-08116-PCT-SPL ) 9 ) 10 Plaintiff, ) ORDER vs. ) ) 11 ) Commissioner of Social Security ) 12 Administration, ) 13 ) ) 14 Defendant. ) 15 Plaintiff Amy Marie Foreman seeks judicial review of the denial of her application 16 for Social Security Disability Insurance under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 17 § 405(g). Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Opening Brief (Doc. 10), Defendant 18 Commissioner of Social Security Administration’s Answering Brief (Doc. 11), Plaintiff’s 19 Reply…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Trevizo v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Kathryn L. Benecke v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API