Legal Opinion

People v. Weathers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 25, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: While a criminal defendant may waive his right to be present at trial, the right is fundamental and of constitutional magnitude, and thus the validity of the waiver must be tested according to constitutional standards (People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 140; People v Burts, 64 AD2d 283, 286-287). “The key issue is whether this defendant, knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently relinquished this known right” (People v Epps, 37 NY2d 343, 350, cert den 423 US 999, citing Johnson v Zerbst, 304 US 458, 464).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. EppsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. BurtsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. EdmondsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. WeathersNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. FergusonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API