Meemic Insurance v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [18]
NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge.
This dispute comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.
I. Facts
Plaintiff Meemic Insurance Company filed suit against Defendant Hewlett-Pack ard Company alleging claims of “Negligence / Products Liability / Breach of Implied Warranty” arising out of a house fire that occurred on January 7, 2008 in Metamora, Michigan. Plaintiff insured the home and filed this…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Werth v. Hill-Rom, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- AUTO CLUB GROUP INS. CO. v. All-Glass Aquarium Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Peak v. Kubota Tractor Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- BOND v. JOHNSON & JOHNSONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- Bledsoe v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.