Legal Opinion

State v. Locks

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1963No. 1218PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

By direct information in the Superior Court of Maricopa County, appellant, Charles Locks, was charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor, Count I and exhibiting and keeping for sale obscene and indecent pictures and writings, Count II, both misdemeanors. The court below dismissed Count II on defendant’s motion in the belief that the Statute, A.R.S. § 13-532 lacked constitutional validity in that it did not specifically require scienter. We reversed holding that scienter was implicit. State v. Locks, 91 Ariz. 394, 372 P.2d 724. Meanwhile, trial was had on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. State v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Dorsey v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  5. The People v. KirkrandIllinois Supreme Court · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dillon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. State v. LocksArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. MaloneyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc. v. WaitmanArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API