Legal Opinion

Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc. v. Waitman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1970No. 9815PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Judge of the Court of Appeals.

The appellant, Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc., filed a complaint against the appellee 'State racing commissioners seeking a declaratory judgment construing A.R.S. Sec. 5 — 110, subsec. C and further requesting a writ of mandamus compelling - the appellees to issue a certain amended racing permit to appellant. The intervenors, Turf Paradise, Iñc. and Arizona Downs, whose horse racing interests conflict with the dog racing interests of appellant, were allowed to intervene in the trial court. The trial court entered judgment construing the statute contrary…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Powers v. IsleyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Automatic Registering MacHine Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  3. City of Tombstone v. MacIaArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mardian Construction Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Slayton v. ShumwayArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Schilling v. EmbreeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Jones v. SterlingArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Arizona State Tax Commission v. Lawrence Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API