Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Marriage of: Pedro Hernan Mendoza & Amanda Eileen Mendoza

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 9, 2021No. 36819-0Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

FILED MARCH 9, 2021 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE In the Matter of the Marriage of ) ) No. 36819-0-III PEDRO HERNAN MENDOZA, ) ) Respondent, ) ) and ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) AMANDA EILEEN MENDOZA, ) ) Appellant. ) STAAB, J. — After trial on this dissolution case the superior court found that attorney Gary Stenzel violated his duty of candor to the court and imposed CR 11 sanctions equal to opposing counsel’s attorney fees and costs. Mr. Stenzel’s motion for reconsideration was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schaefco, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Buckner, Inc. v. Berkey Irrigation SupplyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  3. Denney v. City of RichlandWashington Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API