Legal Opinion

Denney v. City of Richland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2020No. 97494-2PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON IN CLERK’S OFFICE MAY 7, 2020 SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON MAY 7, 2020 SUSAN L. CARLSON SUPREME COURT CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CHRISTOPHER DENNEY, ) ) No. 97494-2 Petitioner, ) ) v. ) En Banc ) CITY OF RICHLAND, ) ) Respondent. ) Filed May 7, 2020 _______________________________________) MADSEN, J.—The RAPs direct a party seeking review of a final judgment to appeal within 30 days, regardless of whether the judgment reserves for future determination an award of attorney fees or costs. RAP 2.2(a)(1), 5.2(a).…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Terry Wayne Sanders v. Clemco Industries and Ingersoll-Rand CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  5. State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Amanda Butler, V. James FinneranCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
  2. Christopher Denney v. City of RichlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
  3. Gene And Maralee Bouma v. Silverado Community AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. Gene And Maralee Bouma v. Silverado Community AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. In the Matter of the Marriage of: Pedro Hernan Mendoza & Amanda Eileen MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API