Legal Opinion

Mulford v. Union Pacific Railroad

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 2014No. 39991PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a negligence action brought pursuant to the Federal Employer’s Liability Act by appellant, Craig L. Mulford. Below, a jury found that respondent, Union Pacific Railroad (UP), was not negligent and Mulford’s claims against UP were dismissed. Mulford timely appealed. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On October 30, 2009, Mulford, a machinist employed by UP, filed a complaint against UP seeking relief under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act (FELA). Mulford’s complaint alleged that he sustained injury to his knees as a result of UP’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State v. HairstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hurtado v. LAND O'LAKES, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Burgess v. Salmon River Canal Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. Daniel Edward Ehrlick, Jr.Idaho Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Rome v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Jeanette Hoffman v. Bd of Local Improvement Dist No. 1101Idaho Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Jordan v. Walmart Associates, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API